Dev Build 3145

[petert82]

Compared to the same thing in 3144:

[J3Rik0]

Hahahahaha…didn’t even notice it in there, thank you very much!!!

[J3Rik0]

<!-- and -->

this is what was missing from the PS, THESE ligatures work flawlessly

[sebdd]

Ligatures aren’t enabled by default for me, anything I need to do in the settings?

macOS, build 3147, Fira Code (OTF)

[gwenzek]

I’m on Ubuntu 14.04 and I got the following error message upon installing build 3147
from the 64-bit .deb package.

Unable to load gdk_pixbuf_read_pixels from libgdk-x11-2.0.so

But the library seems to be properly installed:

$ locate libgdk-x11-2.0.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.23

Does other people have the same problem ?

[ihodev]

I’m on Ubuntu 14.04 and I got the following error message upon installing build 3147
from the 64-bit .deb package.

Unable to load gdk_pixbuf_read_pixels from libgdk-x11-2.0.so

But the library seems to be properly installed:

$ locate libgdk-x11-2.0.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.23

Does other people have the same problem ?

Currently, you have to downgrade to the previous version:

" One of the changes in this build inadvertently made it depend on a newer version of GTK, we’ll fix that for the next dev build, but I don’t have an ETA." – Jon

[Nicolay]

Ligature != doesn’t work with C++.

It works with JS for example. Ligatures actually look great in JS.

[jbrooksuk]

I too have noticed a bug with ligatures. Comments starting with < are being rendered without the preceding < glyph.

[mattst]

Same gdk_pixbuf problem using Linux Mint 17 [Based On: Ubuntu 14.04.5].

$ /opt/sublime_text/sublime_text
Unable to load gdk_pixbuf_read_pixels from libgdk-x11-2.0.so

Can anyone think of a way around this? Web search solutions were unhelpful.

Unfortunately the following did not help:

$ sudo apt-get install libgtk2.0-0
libgtk2.0-0 is already the newest version.

The other likely contender libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 is also already installed.

[kingkeith]

Upgrading Ubuntu will help

as discovered on Discord:

you need a version newer than version 2.0 - 2.31 for example
https://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/headers_diff/gdk-pixbuf/2.30.8/2.31.0/diff.html
The latest version available for ubuntu 14.04 is 2.30.7

So you can either wait for the next dev build or upgrade your Ubuntu I proved it works on 16.04.

[kingkeith]

Note that some ligature related bugs in 3147 are also being discussed here:

Ligature Buggos

Super stoked to see the ligature support! I started a new thread here for folks to share bugs associated with this particular feature. On my current build of 3147 I am noticing that the ligature support does not seem to work when the ligature is surrounded by other characters. Screenshot is attached. [image] Note that in the first function, date->str, the ligature does not render. In the second function you can see when it is used as a thread macro, (-> ...) it renders great.

[mattst]

[quote=“kingkeith, post:47, topic:32340, full:true”]So you can either wait for the next dev build or upgrade your Ubuntu I proved it works on 16.04.
[/quote]
For me using Linux Mint 17 (Ubuntu 14.04) upgrading to the latest version of Mint (18.2 - Ubuntu 16.04) effectively requires a clean install. I keep meaning to get around to it, but it’ll be 4 to 6 hours of tediousness to sort: my desktop how I like it, my 50+ altered system hot keys (20+ of which run my own scripts needing the full path pasted) and all need to be manually re-entered, NTP, crontab, swappiness, custom icons, mass storage fstabs, mount points, grub, … make that 4 to 8 hours. Maybe I should install Linux Mint Debian Edition and avoid having to go through this pain every few years.

[addons_zz]

dwrite_cleartype_classic, and dwrite_cleartype_natural

I tried using these options but I could not notice anything different with Consolas font size 14.

---

Now on build 3147 my fonts are rendered wider than on build 3144, Issue: $1984

Can this be fixed?

[addons_zz]

Correction, after testing it with Consolas font, it seems bigger, not just wider:

Reducing the font size, makes it smaller than it was while on build 3144:

Update

I was using font size 14, both on build 3144 and 3147. Now I set my font size to 13.5, and now I have the same font size as 3144 with size 14. So, nothing to fix, except my configuration files.

@danghm, you need to recude you font size like using fractional points like 13.5 to get the same size as the build 3144.

[danghm]

Thanks, I did reduce my font size a little bit, but the letter spacing is actually just the same as build 3144 with no_round option. Not a big deal though. I get used to it after half day coding

My wishlist on the rendering engine right now is:

• Ability to reduce font weight. This one is very important because on dark theme and light theme it looks very different. On Atom I use a CSS snippet to adjust Pragmata Pro on a dark theme:

atom-text-editor {
  -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased;
  -webkit-text-stroke: 0.1px;
}

• Ability to adjust letter spacing. Some font like Pragmata Pro and Iosevka looks nice but the spaces are too tight to stare at for the whole day.

To make SanFrancisco Mono looks the same as on Atom, I had to modify the font, and it not easy at all.

[deathaxe]

System:

• Win 10 1703
• dpi_scale 1.0
• resolution 1900x1200
• ST 3147 x64
• ClearType enabled and tuned (no default settings)

Tested fonts:

• Roboto Mono
• Source Code Pro
• Consolas

Results:

• Fonts render render with same visual “thickness” on dark and light background, that’s great!
• Even grey fonts are better visible on white background

About “dwrite_cleartype_classic” and “dwrite_cleartype_natural”:

• Both options have same results on my machine, with all three tested fonts.
• Horizontal font spacing looks a bit erratic if one of the options is enabled. This effect is more significant for smaller font_sizes <12 and disapears with >=14. Maybe there are just not enough pixels on my screen. I can’t even say which version looks better. Some font spacing get better others worse.
• larger fonts don’t look less smooth and accurate with these options, especially letters like o, a
• I can’t confirm font size changes like @addons_zz stated, when toggling the option.

[addons_zz]

I can’t confirm font size

When I use the options I do not get font size changes. I get font size changes when I switch between build 3144 and 3147 (bigger than 3144). Indeed the text I wrote is misleading. I am going to try to rephrase it.

[facelessuser]

I’m not sure if the font difference between one version to another matters. Maybe it does. The real question is which version 's sizes are more accurate? I mean the entire font rendering was rewritten, so imagine the algorithm is a bit different (maybe better?). I guess better can be subjective.

Maybe there is a miscalculation, but it may also be that you are just used to the size in the previous version, and now its different. Or maybe these kind of things just don’t bother me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

[devcarlos]

Dev Build 3147 some font ligatures aren’t working, i’m on MacOS High Sierra 10.13.

Also @jps will there be an option to choose a specific font just for font ligatures? I like Fira Code ligatures but not a massive fan of the font, so If I could use their ligatures with Roboto Mono like it’s capable of doing in Atom that would be great.

[djspiewak]

Just a quick shout out, @jps and @wbond: thanks. Sublime remains a fantastic and irreplaceable part of my toolkit, and it’s great to see it continue to move forward. It’s not without its flaws, but the good vastly, vastly outweighs the bad. My license is one of the best investments I’ve ever made, and I’m actively looking forward to getting a chance to further support its development with future paid upgrades.