This sure gets requested a lot for a feature nobody would use.
Printing Capability
For what itâs worth, I ended up in this forum because I was certain I must be missing something when I couldnât find a way to print from sublime.
Itâs not a big deal and there are plenty of alternatives. I love sublime for other reasons (huge files, json formatting), but I was surprised. Also surprised by the forum animosity.
To the discussion I will only add this point of view. I wouldnât bother with a printing plugin specifically because there are so many alternatives at hand and I donât need it often.
Cheers,
Wallace
Came here for the same issue, considered this as a stable text editor company-wide. But spending 2750 dollars a year for a text editor that canât print by default is to us just a deal breaker, considering we print many thousands pages of text every year. We are required both by law and clients, to have some of our data in printed form.
Yes, there are plugins and you can of course, install Notepad++, copy it to that, then print there, but honestly it just makes us question what other basic functionality it misses.
For 50-80 dollars per seat, you shouldnât have to figure out another way.
It would be like buying Excel, only to find out that it canât calculate and you have to use the calculator for that.
No, itâs like complaining that Excel wonât play your MP3 files.
Now you probably can get Excel to play MP3 files, but you can also get ST to print since thereâs a plugin for it.
The reason people like ST is because itâs focused on one thing, and it does it very well: editing text. Printing is not a core function of ST, get over it.
Not to mention the fact that also STâs direct âcompetitorâ (Atom before and VScode now) needs a plugin to print too, so the lack of native printing capability is not so uncommon but pretty standard imhoâŚ
Text editing goes in hand with printing (the vast majority of commercial text editors allow printing), comparing it to excel/MP3 is beyond silly. So, lets look at Atom editor, one important difference, Atom is FREE, Notepad++ is FREE, Visual Studio Code is FREE. ST want 50-65 dollars A YEAR per user in any form of commercial setting and still 80 dollars+upgrade fee later for just a personal user. So to compare them is again silly.
So fine, you donât use printing or need it as a core function, that up to you.
Atom/VSCode are free, even for commercial use. So they can be excused. Not direct competitors. If ST wants to be like Atom/VSCode, they could slash prices to 0 dollars too. Hey, it is a great product (even though it is wonky when used across multiple machines) and I have no problem paying, this is just a deal breaker for anything further. That is fine, if we for the for the price arenât allowed to voice what we need, they could just shut this forum down.
ST is loved and paid for by people who code and create websites and the like, thatâs why it doesnât have a printing facility. Itâs generally pointless for these people to print, and for the minority that do, itâs usually a sign of incompetence or mediocrity.
But you need printing. Congratulations! So go and find a tool that satisfies your needs instead of trying to ruin or at least diminish a fine product that is working for all of us who it is mean for.
That is fine, if we for the for the price arenât allowed to voice what we need, they could just shut this forum down.
No-one is stopping you from posting your nonsensical rants here, but Iâm wondering why youâre so upset that other people are also free to post their own opinions, including those that are contrary to, or criticise yours. You must feel that youâre somehow special, with special rights beyond everyone elseâs.
It is a somewhat shoddy way to run a business. But how exactly does it ruin your product?
Ah this thread never ceased to entertain: an infinite loop of people arguing aggressively over basic facts:
- printing is not a core feature and will very likely never be, no matter the number of request or how aggressive/patronizing the post is (which by the way is kind of the worst way to request something âŚ)
- printing can be done by plugin
- plugins are not a work-around, they are the main way to adapt Sublime to your workflow.
- ST does not have to address everyone needs, not all editors should be the same, to each its strength, up to you to find the one that fit your need the best.
But hey, please continue to insult each others, Iâll prepare some popcorn
Itâs not my product, I didnât write it. But Sublime Text would be ruined if it was loaded up with pointless features which would increase complexity and maintainability. ST is good because itâs largely a fast, simple editor. Having the developers distracted from the core functionality would diminish the rest of the product because it would get less attention and would lose focus. There are many, many bloated apps out there which do many things, none of them particularly well. Go and seek those out instead of trying to make ST one of them is what Iâm saying.
Donât worry, one day youâll learn how to code and you wonât need to anymore.
I have been writing code since 1975: college(undergraduate, and grad school), hobby stuff, and 25 years as a software engineer.
You will find my work in published software.
Some things are best done on the screen, some things work best on paper.
It is much easier to tutor somebody with the code on paper.
I find that I can quickly and easily mark up a paper listing, With all my ideas on paper, I can then concenrate on implementing each individual cange without worrying that I will forget some of the ideas or the details.
Youâre right⌠BUT SublimeText is a TEXT EDITOR. People expect a text editor to offer a print function and I think this is perfectly understandable. If Iâm spending $ 80 on a text editor, Iâd like to be able to print, for example, a shopping list from it, if I need to. And thatâs without the need to install anything extra.
Printing does not require any special effort from programmers or writing complicated procedures. Nearly every programming book describes how to easily print plain unformatted text.
You can also look at it from a business perspective: if printing were implemented, SublimeText could gain a larger group of users who - maybe rarely - but still want to use printing.
I donât mind printing with a plugin. Itâs a great solution. There is one condition - it must work, ideally without having to manually install additional libraries, relying on external programs (browser) and so on.
SublimeText is my favorite editor, Iâve been using it daily for seven years. I would prefer not to use other editors, installed or launched just to be able to print a few lines of text from time to time. Hope itâs not that hard to understand.
Why?
If you are going to have another editor installed just to print, whatâs the problem with sending the text to a browser for print?
Did you read my post? I DONâT WANT to install anything. I want to use âPrintâ command from âFileâ menu in SublimeText. Or use plugin which prints my text WITHOUT using web browser, notepad or any external application.
Yes, yes, I read your post, I saw you mentioned having to have other editors:
I would prefer not to use other editors,
I realize you were saying youâd prefer not to have those OR print in a browser. I donât know what you actually do to navigate around print. It just seems unnecessary that youâd have to install another editor if you could easily print in a browser via a plugin (even if you donât like the idea of printing in a browser). Browsers are usually available without you having to install anything extra.
Iâm not going to debate whether printing in a browser is bad or not because it is a subjective argument. Some will hate it despite it being fairly inconvenient, and some wonât care.