Sublime License

[RiverLeaf]

My name is Mark Stewart. I have two emails.

mark.stewart@shaw.ca is used to purchase Sublime Text years ago, and Shaw.ca my ISP has turned that email into a junk mail magnet.

mark@riverleaf.net is my code work email, where I wish Sublime was registered.

Problem:
posts from mark.stewart@shaw.ca get lots of attention, noticed when I go online to this forum, lost in tons of junk mail on my desktop…
posts from mark@riverleaf are serious but only seem to attract attention of entity fichte-foll. German friend says, “You don’t want to know.”

Question: how do I shut off purchasing email, use professional email, and lose the fichte-foll nuisance?

[kingkeith]

calling our longest standing, most knowledgeable, helpful and respected community member a nuisance isn’t going to win you any friends here… if you don’t want answers from our helpful community then you should just delete your forum account, problem solved

[kct3937]

Ahh, And I thought that I was the only one who was ignored on this forum…and I wouldn’t touch Shaw.ca. Where was the insult to the German member? I certainly didn’t see one and I know a good insult when I see one. Since this member is in my part of the world, I will say that I agree in the lack of helpful response on this forum.

The answer is not to suggest that he delete his account rather answer him simply, concisely, and politely…verstehe?

[nutjob2]

The answer is not to suggest that he delete his account rather answer him simply, concisely, and politely…verstehe?

Great idea! Maybe you show us how it’s done. Here’s one of his posts, verbatim, please go ahead and “answer him simply, concisely, and politely.”

Important note concerning ST development model. Concept ofAccessibility remembered by all. Sublime market model is ad hocdeveloper-dive-in. It has two problems and only 2 ways forward. Itwould be nice if formal admin was established, as for now…

1. admin unattached to dev: releases slanted item, frequently trashed
2. devo unattached to admin: releases slanted item, frequentlytrashed
   Original idea: all contribute as plugins, be devout plugin managers.Problem: plugins conflict. What did we not know in advance?! Evenbigger problem as cultural perception: devo stampede to Atom andCodeKit has left ST admin with pot of rancid percolating who-knows-what, and no devs to push anything through. Atom and CodeKit junkieslant-and-trash is far, FAR more chaotic, sold as is in its devo-onlyslant-trash 'competitive [NOT] framework. Useless products fortypical User: fluffy functionality more like “devo masturbationfrenzy watching alien headless-tailess dogs fuscking [not mydescription, but I like it]”, than serious programming. Sublimemay have been psycho, but at least it was not dog-scat. Perceptiononly. Actual cultural reality, US is going red-neck. Since US is Eurogrunt camp, that means ‘global’ Euro-military colonial slushfunds dragging everyone down sideways (are we really surprised bythe Crusader nose dive), which is where not just Empire’sgrandest hackers are running, crazed. Military coding is ((secret))coding: i.e., NOT User product, nor any interest in same. I hope thatSublime turns back into a coder version of Ever-Note. Minus 50+Crusade war zones per annual corporate Terror budget, Trump-townSublime? Hopeless hope, here. We would all prefer diversity, Useraccess. Not another Atomic spectacle. No Definition bugs. Useraccess.