I am not able to use goto definition on Protobuf files.
Sublime doesn't index protobuf files
let’s assume you are using https://packagecontrol.io/packages/Protobuf%20Syntax%20Hightlighting
probably you should log an issue at
https://github.com/VcamX/protobuf-syntax-highlighting/issues
because there is no tmPreferences
file to tell ST what scopes to index and I guess the syntax doesn’t scope anything in such a way that it would automatically be included in the index
Hi there.
So I was looking at that repo again and I’m specifically interested in the
Protobuf.sublime-syntax file.
My setup:
I have just downloaded and placed that file in User generated new syntax file directory and I was looking at it there.
My State:
Not a sublime text plugin expert unfortunately, but would love to path the syntax file to get up and running with my gRPC adventure.
Observation:
I noticed a distinct thing in Protobuf.sublime-syntax:
If I comment out the option_inline:
section (in the above images) the syntaxes in the lines down get somewhat properly highlighted. But on the same line, after the variable name, nothing get’s highlighted.
If I keep that section, then after one definition of “Option” in 1st line, nothing, afterwards and below get’s highlighted.
.
.
.
# Option
option:
- match: '\b(option)\b'
scope: storage.type.annotation.proto
push:
- match: ';'
scope: punctuation.terminator.option.proto
pop: true
- include: option_inline
- include: or_pop
# option_inline:
# - match: '{{ident}}'
# scope: variable.annotation.proto
# - include: full_option_name
# - match: =
# scope: keyword.operator.assignment.proto
# push: option_value
full_option_name:
- match: \(
scope: punctuation.definition.name.option.begin.proto
push:
- match: (\))(?:(\.){{ident}})?
captures:
1: punctuation.definition.name.option.end.proto
2: punctuation.accessor.proto
3: variable.annotation.proto
pop: true
- match: '{{ident}}(\.)'
captures:
1: variable.namespace.proto
2: punctuation.accessor.proto
- match: '{{ident}}'
scope: variable.annotation.proto
.
.
.
Can some syntax experts here, help edit this grammar file?
Can some syntax experts here, help edit this grammar file?
Why you want to modify it or what you are trying to accomplish?